Fuel at Westfield-Barnes (BAF)

This morning I decided to go to an airport I haven’t been before for some fuel. Barnes airport in Westfield, MA has fuel for roughly 60 cents cheaper than I can get at Nashua. It isn’t the cheapest fuel around but with 45 gallons pumped it does add up to something substantial. The savings still isn’t enough to pay for the round trip but of course that doesn’t really matter because I’d be flying anyway!

The weather was forecast to be VFR with relatively high ceilings at 6-7000 feet. There was a low probability of some very isolated and low impact precipitation. This is ample weather for VFR (Visual Flight Rules) flight although I do usually prefer to cruise at a higher altitude when I can.

For about a week now we’ve had gusty winds almost every day. So today I was working with winds gusting up to 20 knots at both Nashua and Barnes. And this was tame compared to the past few days with gusts of 25-35 knots! The good news was the gusty winds were out of the northwest and thus pretty close to straight down the runway in both cases. The bad news is these strong winds aloft meant for a bumpy ride.

Not long after departing Nashua I could see that there were some areas of snow showers. Most seemed to be off to my right in the Monadnock region, but there were some snow showers ahead too. I could see through them which is a good indicator that VFR flight through them is fine. There is no risk of structural icing (the really scary kind that the Cardinal is not design to handle) in this case because the precipitation is already frozen solid and will not adhere. In light snow showers like this I do turn on the pitot heat which protects the protruding pitot tube which measures airspeed from the very unlikely scenario of becoming clogged with snow. In this case the snow was much too light for this and thus it was just a precaution.

The coolest thing about the snow showers is that they were snow at my altitude of 4500 feet, rain below, and in most cases were completely evaporated by the time they reached the ground. The air here has been very dry! Sadly, I did not bring my camera and the ride was really way too bumpy to try and get something with my cell phone.

The approach into Barnes was pretty turbulent. I made a right base entry for runway 33. The showers were finished by about the Quabbin Reservoir crossing and looking to the west from the Barnes area it looked like fewer clouds and clearer skies. Winds were gusty but straight down the runway. The base leg for 33 was a bit weird as there is a ridge of terrain that hides the airport until you crossed it (similar to my trip to AVP).

I didn’t make any prior arrangements with the Airflyte FBO but as I taxied into the ramp area there was someone from there marshaling me into a spot next to a Bonanza. After shutting down he set chocks and I asked him to top off the plane. There are actually two competing FBOs and a restaurant at Barnes in a very sleek looking building with an observation deck (reportedly the restaurant operates tables up there in the summer). The restaurant was doing an Easter buffet brunch and so it was packed with locals in Easter Sunday outfits. Many of them were going up to check out the observation deck.

All in all I spent about 20 minutes on the ground wandering around the terminal while the plane was fueled. With the bill settled I headed back out to the airplane. The controller at Barnes was able to arrange for flight following on the ground which is always nice especially with the Class D airspace tangle of Barnes and nearby Westover Air Base (don’t go there without permission!).

The snow showers were a bit more intense on the way back but still nothing of concern. Because of direction/cruising altitude rules I was at 5,500 feet this time and thus closer to the cloud bases. The ride was definitely bumpier as a result and there were a few moments of what I’d call moderate turbulence.

Nashua was deserted when I arrived and there was no traffic to follow so I was cleared to land midfield downwind. I asked the tower for an up to date wind check and they reported “occasional gusts to 22″ (22 knots). Winds were definitely strong on the approach and I had considerable wind correction in on my base leg. Turning final the crosswind became a headwind. With a gusty headwind I used more power on the approach, still taking it fully out just before the threshold. With the ground speed reduced by the headwind the touchdown was very smooth.

I was amused that the controller asked me where I was parking as I was rolling out. They were always familiar with where the rental planes were going because they see these tail numbers all the time. But my tail number isn’t familiar yet. I told her “Electric ramp.” They ask this because with no one behind they will tell you to go further down the runway to a taxiway exit closer to the parking spot. Probably eventually they will remember the tail number!

2 thoughts on “Fuel at Westfield-Barnes (BAF)

  1. Pete Zaitcev

    6000 ft is usually where a non-turbocharged airplane with constant speed prop goes the fastest. The air is too thick below, and power drops off quickly above.

  2. Dan Post author

    The PoH is in the airplane so I can’t confirm right now but I think the same (or nearly so) cruise speed can be achieved slightly more economically at 7000 or so. In practice though the plane seems happiest cruising at 7-9000 feet and the air is usually smoother at that altitude anyway. I haven’t gone above 8,500 yet – waiting for that perfect tailwind!

Comments are closed.